home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: morris.vip.best.com!user
- From: morris@best.com (Paul Morris)
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax,comp.dcom.modems
- Subject: Re: Q: Class 2 vs Class 2.0
- Date: Tue, 09 Apr 1996 21:07:56 -0700
- Organization: Best Internet Communications
- Message-ID: <morris-0904962107570001@morris.vip.best.com>
- References: <314806F3.55AF@none.com> <4i97ds$q2q@nntp1.best.com> <pumaDoHB8y.LrI@netcom.com> <314e0ca6.43085862@news1.io.org> <4j7l55$p4c@tribune.cris.com> <4j81vn$aqc@lori.albany.net> <DpDwA9.BtK@greenie.muc.de> <4kdnm7$qhd@lori.albany.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: morris.vip.best.com
-
- In article <4kdnm7$qhd@lori.albany.net>, akozak@hourglass.com (Al
- Kozakiewicz) wrote:
-
- > In article <DpDwA9.BtK@greenie.muc.de>, gert@greenie.muc.de says...
- >
- > >Maybe the problem is in ZetaFAX? Mgetty+sendfax and Hylafax work fine with
- > >the USR in class 2.0 mode...
- >
- > ZetaFAX seems to think the problem is with the modem. I do know that of all
- > the modems which claim class 2 or 2.0 compliance that we tried, only the USR
- > Sportsters failed consistently during the connect negotiation (a couple of
- > other models which claimed class 2 or 2.0 compliance failed later in the
- > send sequence). Since there are literally dozens of inexpensive class
- > 2/2.0 modems which work flawlessly with ZetaFAX (which implies a rigid
- > adherence to the standard on the part of the software), it looked to me like
- > the modem is the culprit.
- >
- > I was pretty disgusted after the whole affair, mostly at myself for naively
- > assuming that "Class 2" compliance was an unambiguous term.
- >
-
-
- My understanding was that class 2 and class 2.0 were NOT the same thing.
-